I really like the trombone sound and none of the other sounds I've used irritate me enough to look further at the moment.
Well, I've found something I don't like Sometimes during playback the timing gets a little, umm, wonky. Interestingly it seems to be note combination specific. E.G I have a piece I'm noodling with and the trumpet is playing quavers... Arrgh, check the attachment. The highlighted note is the problem child. If I change it from the Bb (Tpt part is still in concert pitch and the key sig is Bb) the problem goes away, otherwise it plays delayed and sounds like a machinegun. At first I thought it might be the synth but then I remembered problems others have had that turned out to be the soundfont so I tried some others. Aside from the generally disappointing brass sounds (familiar complaint? ) playback was fine. So it seems the soundfont is what's at fault. I haven't tried a different synth to check if it's the combination of soundfont and synth or if it's purely the soundfont.
Anyhoo, one soundfont I tried was a different Merlin version: Merlin_Audigy(v1.14) and it's better, though I've still found a slight hint of the timing issues so I'm now on a serious hunt for a new favourite soundfont. Or maybe synth, still not sure if it's the combination of the two that makes the problem apparent...
<edit> Update: I've now tested this soundfont with a different synth and the problem remains so Coolsoft appears to be exonerated. "Soundfont Shuffle" time again, sigh
Hey @Richard Woodroffe , how does the web based playback of .nwc files on the Scripto work? Are you sending audio or a MIDI stream?
I'm asking because the talk above about the Ravel piece made me a little curious and I chose to play it back before I downloaded it and felt the audio wasn't the best. When I downloaded it and played back through the Coolsoft synth it was much better.
N.B. I haven't bothered to hack my Win10 to use the coolsoft synth as the default MIDI device.
Basta cercare nello Scriptorium: Ravel - Tableaux d'une exposition. N.B. Non posso passarti il link diretto perché Rich, onde evitare casini, ha fatto in modo che non fossero possibili.
From Google translate: Just look in the Scriptorium: Ravel - Tableaux d'une exposition. N.B. I can't give you the direct link because Rich made sure they were not possible in order to avoid trouble. ====
Raffaele: In Flurmy's reply you may have noticed that the word "Scriptorium" is faintly underlined. This indicates it is a link and in this case will take you to the part of the scriptorium where Ravel's works are listed.
Si ok funziona! grazie. Ho notato che il massimo di canali sono 16. Ma è impossibile non mettere 2 strumenti in un canale.. . In una strumentazione di orchestra e Banda sarebbe praticamente impossibile.
From Google translate: Yes ok it works! thank you. I noticed that the maximum of channels are 16. But it is impossible not to put 2 instruments in one channel ... In an orchestra and band instrumentation it would be practically impossible. ==== True, but on the other hand, if you are trying to emulate an orchestra then all the trumpets will be close together, and all the violins will be close together etc. and if each group are sharing a channel then there is no real benefit of trying to pan each trumpet, or each violin etc. to separate them. In the real world you would not be able to tell which trumpet is playing from it's position.
Thus, panning the channel that all the trumpets are on so they sound like they are coming from the trumpet location in the orchestra is sufficient.
I tried to handle these values (127-0) But practically nothing happens. The sounds remain central. With the Multipoint controller, on the other hand, I had a good spatial arrangement
The only way I can think of that this might happen is if there is another staff, below the one you set, that is on the same channel and has the pan settings at 64.
E.G. Staff1 is Trumpet 1 is on, say, channel 3 with pan at 25, BUT Staff2 is Trumpet 2 and is also on channel 3 but with pan at 64. Because both staves are on the same channel the last staff processed defines all the staff settings for both staves, including pan settings.
Two files attached each with 2 staves: PanDemo1.nwctxt is alternating trumpets on different MIDI channels (1 and 2), left, then right, then left again etc. and plays back that way. PanDemo2.nwctxt is alternating trumpets on the SAME MIDI channel (1), staff 1 is set left and staff 2 is set right but on playback everything from both staves is to the right
È tutto molto lento. Anche se ho un metronomo di 120 la musica va a 20 bpm
From Google Translate: Everything is very slow. Even though I have a metronome of 120 the music goes at 20 bpm More ... LikeQuote ====
I assume this means the note chase is also slow. I have no idea how this can be so. I could understand if the note chase was normal speed and the sound was slow, but not both because as far as I know there is no 2-way communication from the synth back to NWC.
Does anyone else have a clue? Am I missing something obvious?
<snip> In practice now the NWC plays the sounds of the VST but evidently struggles and plays them in slow motion. So the virtual cable works. Maybe my RAM doesn't have the strength to make it all work. or it's a latency problem. I will try to download Asio4all
This isn't what I'd call a latency problem, which is more of a delay rather than slow motion.
I think it is probably related to the VST host, but could you tell me if the note chase in NWC has slowed down, or does the note chase happen at normal speed and only the sound is slow?
Please check this before installing ASIO4all if it's not too late.
Hi Raffaele, I'm glad we had this conversation. I realise that it may have seemed lengthy and like it was going around in circles sometimes, but I also think that there are others reading it that now have a much better idea of what VST is and isn't about.
Had we not corresponded then they would still be in the dark.
Voglio chiarire il fatto che io uso nwc dal 2005. In quel momento avevo la versione demo. Poi ho comprato la versione 2,75 e ho detto "finalmente". Poi ho scoperto cool soft, ed ero sempre più felice. Ora non sarebbe male se uscisse un aggiornamento di suoni vst già pronti e subito compatibili. Pagherei senza problemi per acquisire quella marcia in più.
From Google Translate: I want to clarify the fact that I have been using nwc since 2005. At that time I had the demo version. Then I bought the 2.75 version and said "finally". Then I discovered cool soft, and I was happier and happier. Now it wouldn't be bad if an update of ready-made and immediately compatible vst sounds came out. I would pay without problems to acquire that extra gear. ==== Sure, native support for VST might be nice, but don't hold your breath. Not even the big name notation products use native VST. Instead they use additional products like Garritan to provide a VST environment. True, for some of them there is a fairly tight integration, but they are still separate products.
What is it you are actually trying to achieve? I really think you need to define this before you jump down the VST rabbit hole.
If you just want reasonable quality playback of your NWC scores then stick with soundfonts. It's easy and usually trouble free. If you want serious processing of the audio you create then get a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) that uses VST (pretty much all of them). In this context, NWC is nothing more than a starting point for getting your ideas into MIDI so that the DAW can render them and allow manipulation of the resultant audio.
For what it's worth I'm not sure VST is what you think it is. Do you realise that you don't need a notation product to use VST? You can record an audio stream directly into a VST system from a microphone, or a guitar, or any other electronic source. Or you can load an mp3, or Ogg Vorbis, or wav file (amongst others) and go from there. You don't actually need MIDI or NWC, or any other notation product. VST is a Virtual recording Studio Technology that happens to be able to take a MIDI data stream and synthesize sounds from the instructions if you have the right plug-in (VSTi). It's the plugins, VSTi's and VSTfx's that do the work.
Quindi mi pare di capire che con sf2 non si possono ottenere risultati professionali... Sigh Quindi in un percorso di crescita il vst mi sa che è una tappa obbligata. Se avessi la sicurezza che con nwc potesse girare tranquillamente i vst, acquisterei sicuramente uno.
From Google Translate: So I understand that with sf2 you can not get professional results ... Sigh So in a path of growth I know that the vst is a must. If I had the certainty that with nwc it could easily run the vst, I would definitely buy one. ====== Umm, what growth path do you have in mind? How professional do you want? Remember, NWC's primary purpose is creating music notation. The fact that it's a pretty good sequencer is almost serendipitous. I think it would be helpful if you have a very clear picture of what you want to achieve.
The quality of sound you get from a soundfont is directly related to the quality of the soundfont, BUT for recording and production purposes you need more than just a soundfont. If your aim is to get into music recording and production then you need a DAW (Digital Audio Workstation), not a notation package. That said, a notation package is a great starting point, it's just not enough by itself.
As mentioned above, I think the real question is what do you want to achieve? OK, Do you just want a nice sounding playback of music you've written? Then a synth and soundfont should be fine. The downside is finding a soundfont you like. I call this the "Soundfont Shuffle" (Actually, the reason I created this thread was for people to share their preferred soundfonts and the reasons for their preference.)
OR, do you want to create recordings for distribution or public performance? You need a DAW, lots of time, dedication and experience, and probably some expensive addons.
N.B. I would definitely NOT be spending money on VST stuff, or soundfonts for that matter, just yet. The first thing to do is explore the free offerings that are available to see their functionality and to determine if this is the direction you want/need to go.
By the way, NWC does NOT run the VST, the same as it does not run any synthesizer. NWC does not create sounds, it outputs a MIDI data stream that is directed to a MIDI output. Where the MIDI stream goes after that is irrelevant to NWC, it literally doesn't care, it just pumps data out the configured port. If the MIDI data eventually reaches a synthesizer then the synth will create sound as described by the MIDI data. If the MIDI data is directed to a VST host then the VST host is responsible for what happens after it receives the data. NWC is no longer involved. Just the same as if the data was sent to a synthesizer.
<snip> Do you think VSTs are really much more effective than SF2s?
For what VST is designed for, yes. But VST is more about music production, not simply playback of a MIDI data stream. E.G. I would never consider using a playback of a simple soundfont as a professional recording, but VST is used all the time for professional recording and mastering. That's the primary purpose of the technology. For more information, this Wikipedia article is well worth reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Studio_Technology
I can think that thanks to the pan functions etc that are in the multipoint controller function, I get the same quality?
VST is much, much more than this. Think all kinds of special effects, filters etc. and considerable control over these things.
Is it really necessary to switch to VST sounds? I am obviously speaking out of ignorance.
No. If a simple synth and soundfont does what you need then there is no point in adding the complexity of VST. For the record I believe that a soundfont and synth is far more appropriate than VST for probably every NWC user there is. Of course, I stand to be corrected on this
<edit> When I wrote the "VST for dummies like me" guide Windows Vista had just hit the streets and there were no drivers for my Creative Soundblaster Audigy II card. (For a while there weren't even any Creative internal cards and as far as I can tell even today the internal cards that are now available do not support soundfonts.) This meant I couldn't use soundfonts, and the Yamaha S-YXG50 softsynth that was my preferred synth wouldn't work either as it wasn't compatible with Vista and there was no hope of it ever being as Yamaha had abandoned it years before. So I needed a solution and the only thing that was available was VST. At least this is what I thought, I later discovered soundfont compatible softsynths. However, there was no easy entry point into VST so after much, much research and messing about I fumbled my way into the solution presented in the guide.
No. Non conosco questo player sonatina. Si scarica a parte? O si scarica insieme al pacchetto?
From Google Translate: "No. I don't know this sonatina player. Does it download separately? Or does it download together with the package?" ==== All I know about it is what I've read. I haven't downloaded it and thus have not tried it either.
Note: This library comes with it’s own sample player, no other software is required.
From this I assumed there was an included player in the download.
Ahh, I've just realised that the Sonatina.dll is the player, and you still need a host like VSTHost. I'm sorry for the confusion. It's 13 years since I wrote that guide and I haven't played with VST for probably 11 of those years as the advent of a soundfont capable softsynth (I think it was Coolsoft) made it unnecessary for me. My primary needs for NWC are notation, not playback. I just need a sufficiently good playback to make sure what I'm writing will work. I certainly don't need the power of full blown VST.
I suspect it might be a good idea to remove either MIDIYoke or Loopbe. I don't see any benefit to having 2 devices that do the same thing and which may conflict. Loopbe seems to have a better reputation than MIDIYoke so perhaps keep it and remove MIDIYoke?
Within VSTHost it might be a good idea to make sure there are no conflicts or double ups (say a connection to both Loopbe AND MIDIYoke). Also make sure the output of VSTHost isn't somehow connected back to the input.
Actually, as a last resort it might be worth removing Loopbe, MIDIYoke AND VSTHost, clean booting and reinstalling just Loopbe and VSTHost. During the uninstall, if there is an option to keep configs I would say NO as there may be a problem in the config that's causing the issue.
No need to uninstall Sonatina as it's just a .dll that you load into VSTHost.
Another thought, have you tried Sonatina's supplied player?
Summing up. The day before yesterday I downloaded 1) Midiox 2) VSTHOST 3) Syntfont (Which I still don't understand what it is for) Once installed I opened Midiox I turned on VSTHOST On VSTHOST I loaded Sonatina.dll as a plugin I have set the midi input both in Midi Mapper Et voilà (Cit) I heard the sounds. Although not consistent, as they alternate pizzicato held etc.
yesterday I did the same sequence again but I didn't get the result
Ok, let's see.
MIDIox itself isn't actually needed. It is a monitoring tool. HOWEVER, you do need a virtual MIDI cable ,either Loopbe OR MIDIYoke (which comes with MIDIox if I recall correctly). Once installed you don't need to run it again as it becomes a driver that is always available.
VSTHost is an environment that VSTi's run in. To explain, VST consists of 2 parts: The VST Host (that VSTHost fulfils - don't be confused by the name coincidence) VSTi's (Virtual Studio Instruments) - these can be all kinds of things, including a synthesizer.
SYNTHFont is a VSTi that is used as a synthesizer that plays the samples in a soundfont. You don't need it for Sonatina so it can be left out.
Sonatina.dll is another VSTi. This is the one that gives you the Sonatina sounds.
I would open VSTHost and make sure Sonatina.dll is still being loaded and that it is connected to the virtual MIDI cable that you want. Then make sure the VSTHost config gets saved - I mention this in the guide.
Load NWC and make sure it is using the same virtual MIDI cable you configured in VSTHost
Once it is working again make sure you save the VSTHost config. From now on you should only need to load VSTHost and then run NWC and it should all just work.
Mi spiego meglio. Queste sono le indicazioni che mi hanno permesso di ascoltare ieri per la prima volta i suoni di Sonatina. Oggi invece non so come mai ma non funziona più come ieri. Si inceppa NWC.
From Google translate: I'll explain. These are the indications that allowed me to listen to the sounds of Sonatina for the first time yesterday. Today, however, I do not know why but it no longer works like it did yesterday. NWC jams.
Umm, OK. I have no idea why NWC should stop working. Although, if I recall correctly, you need to make sure the VST host is loaded before you start NWC. If it isn't, NWC shouldn't crash, but just not make any sounds. To be clear, the MIDI standard is what's called an "unreliable transport". This means that the protocol does not guarantee that the message gets from the transmitter to the receiver. For this reason there is no communication from the VST host to NWC so I cannot see how the VST host could possibly cause NWC to lockup. Can you describe when the lockup occurs? Do you have time to get into |Tools|Options|MIDI (tab) to change the output device? It may be there is a problem with Loopbe (you indicated you used this instead of MIDIYoke which is described in the explanation)
You are very kind to answer. I really thank you! I downloaded Vsthost as per the explanation downloaded from the site. initially it worked. Now I don't know what happened but NWC gets stuck. I downloaded Loopb1, Now it doesn't jam, but it doesn't feel. Can you give me the installation instruction link?
It is extremely unusual for Noteworthy to crash. Not saying I've never seen it happen, but it is very rare.
Perhaps if you try a different VST host?
Loopbe is known to work with NWC so I don't expect it is a problem. As Sonatina comes with its own player maybe you could try a different VST host. I'm not sure if you can load the Sonatina samples into a third party VST host application or not so you might need to look at a different sound set too.
Of course this is entirely optional. If you have no desire to experiment in this fashion that's fine.
Now, while I cannot speak for NWC, I am aware that when it was first envisioned MIDI was (and really still is) king. So NWC was designed to output to MIDI, presumably in order to maximise options. You can drive any MIDI synth you can connect to, be it internal or external: Electric piano, organ, keyboard, software synth module, internal sound card (with HW synth), external sound module, VST host &etc.
There is a beta of the viewer that has the ability to load soundfonts, so I'd guess this is a direction NWC was planning to go. Unfortunately that beta is now 3 years old and there have been no updates so I can only assume that something has gotten in the way of the developer doing this work. As NWC does everything I need I am happy to await developments.
An inbuilt Soundfont player and/or VST host would be amazing but is not really necessary. I certainly would not like to lose the current MIDI functionality if that became a necessary tradeoff.
Bill, do you have a reputable source for that one? I am having some issues with CoolSoft and thought I might switch to see if it resolves them.
Hey SEBC, What issues are you having? I have a problem where I get timing glitches every so often... The playback will stumble or very occasionally suddenly speed up as if trying to catch up after a slowdown. Doesn't happen often and rarely in the same place. I'm not sure if it's the synth or something else in this Win10 abomination, but while rare it is annoying.
Hello everyone. I have bought the NWC in the past and am really happy with it. Now I would like to go to the next step. I downloaded the files of the "Sonatina Symphonic Orchestra" I downloaded the Loobe1 virtual cable Now I don't know in practice how to make them work. What should I do in practice?
G'day Raffaele, from what I've read Sonatina in VSTi form comes with its own sample player. I assume this is a VST host of some kind. If this is the version you have then I recommend you check out a couple of how to type documents from Rich Nagle, and myself. Rich's document is better than mine. They are on the Scripto: https://nwc-scriptorium.org/helpful.html#Vst
I also note there seems to be a soundfont version of Sonatina in which case you'd need a synth that accepts soundfonts - the default we all seem to be using is the CoolSoft VitrualMIDISynth. If this is the version of Sonatina you have then a document by Richard Woodroffe in the same location on the Scripto, just under Rich Nagle's document is aimed at the Coolsoft synth.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned recently is that the "play to" feature of the Viewer is only available if you are running the 2.8 beta version. (I'm pretty sure that is true, but someone please correct me if I'm wrong).
Now I think about it I'm pretty sure you're correct. Given SEBC mentioned the feature I assume they are running it.
My editor output is Microsoft GS Wavetable Synth. I’m not sure how to add Unison or whatever to the editor. Or how to add Microsoft to the Viewer (if that will solve the problem).
To get your preferred soundfont (Unison) working in the editor 3 steps are required, I assume at least 2 of them are already done as you mentioned you have Coolsoft VirtualMidiSynth.
For completeness, the three steps are:
Install Coolsoft VirtualMidiSynth to your machine. I believe this is already done in your case.
Select the required soundfont in the synth. I believe this, too, is already done in your case.:
click on the Coolsoft synth icon in the system tray
click on configuration
make sure the "Soundfonts" tab is active
Make sure the required soundfont is active in the dialogue, if not click the green "+" sign and add it
For the editor, MIDI out is selected in |Tools|Options|MIDI (tab)|Devices used by play back:| Your Coolsoft synth should appear here. If not, select it from the Available devices. Also, REMOVE the microsoft one if it is in the "Devices Used" list so you only have the Coolsoft one active.
N.B. You cannot add the Microsoft soundset to the viewer as it isn't a soundfont and you need a soundfont for the "play to" feature to work.
If I were doing what you are I would configure coolsoft and the NWC editor as mentioned above, and I would set the same soundfont as used in Coolsoft as the Viewer soundfont. Then I would select the Viewers output as the internal synth. (see reply 10 (from me) earlier in this thread)
So many great questions. When you say editor, do you mean NWC 2 where I do my composing?
Dynamics are the same as the piano. My editor uses the Windows computer standard sound font. It sounds fine in the editor. Trombone is its own channel. The muting does not happen on playback in the NCW Viewer as well. I’m not sure how to check what sound font the Viewer is using. The difference appears constant with the three fonts I have loaded (unison 2 , FluidR3, and Titanic)
The editor is NWC where you do your writing/composing.
Matching dynamics eliminates that possibility.
For the editor, MIDI out is selected in |Tools|Options|MIDI (tab)|Devices used by play back:| - Your Coolsoft synth should appear here.
For the editor soundfonts are assigned in your synth.
In the Viewer you can also select a soundfont in |Tools|Soundfont| - this may or may not be the same soundfont you use in the Coolsoft synth
For the Viewer you can select a play back device through |Tools|Options| where an external synth or the internal synth can be selected. You don't have to use the internal synth, even if you have loaded a soundfont in the viewer.
Playback to an audio format (mp3 or FLAC) uses the internal synth thus you need to assign a soundfont to it if you wish to use this feature.
Given point 7 above, is the soundfont used by the player's internal synth the same as loaded in the Coolsoft synth? If not then this is likely the source of the difference.
Thanks for your help. You didn’t mention it but this only works on the top staff, for future reference. <snip>
True, but that's the case for quite a few formatting goodies.
Nevertheless, I will use them in each part where I want to force a new page when extracting partiture. As you noted, they are ignored if there's a visible staff above them. Something to keep in mind when layering staves.
Hi SEBC, it's of less interest these days as things like being able to gap the staff have made it pretty obsolete.
The idea is to use a block, or blocks, of white colour to cover over things you didn't want to see on a printout. Simply create a text object using a character that gives the shape you want and set it to whatever highlight colour you've changed to white.
The "g" character from the Webdings font gives a nice rectangular block that works well.
I've searched the forum for "Digital Whiteout" and I find many references to it, but I haven't figured out how to select "White" as a color. It seems like the color choices are fixed, and white is not one of them. How do I make text white?
Hey mate, Merry Christmas 'n stuff...
You're quite correct, none of the default colo(u)rs are white, BUT you can change the colour of any attribute you want.
For digital whiteout simply select one of the highlight colours and set it to white. Tools (menu) | Options... | Color (tab) - click on the colour you want to change (it's been a while but I think I used to use Highlight 7) - click the change button... you know the rest
<edit> Looks like HM posted while I was faffing about
As I'm sure anyone who has spent any time looking for a soundfont that suits them knows, it can be a very long and frustrating exercise, so I thought it could be good if we pooled our discoveries.
Which soundfonts do you like, which ones do you dislike and reasons for both.
Bear in mind, this is all subjective and should NOT be considered an objective critique as your mileage WILL vary. My personal priority is for good sounding winds, particularly brass. Of course my interpretation of good and yours will surely be different. My preferences are heavily informed by my trombone playing. If you are, say, a piano player I'm sure piano sounds will be your priority, ditto if you are a string or reed player etc..
Something I've found interesting. In many cases certain sounds will be identical between very different soundfonts. I can only assume there has been a lot of "borrowing" going on between authors, or perhaps many of them have used the same sources for some of their sounds. Because of my bias for brass I have noticed this particularly in the brass sounds.
I'll kick it off: LIKE:
I really like the trombone sound and none of the other sounds I've used irritate me enough to look further at the moment.
The trombone sound is terrible and the Bright Acoustic Piano is trying to be a Harpsicord. Also seems to have playback problems on Acoustic Grand patch
The trombone sound is terrible
Several Creative fonts distributed with soundblaster cards I've purchased over the years
Obviously computer generated, just disappointing, though sax sounds seem to work
These are clearly related to the Roland sounds distributed with Windows and we all know why we don't use that!
Around 20 other soundfonts (list below)
For most of them the trombone (and other brass) is just plain wrong. In many cases strings are good, but I've found a few where violin sounds in particular are sub-standard. In general they aren't awful, I just don't like them. YMMV
Yamaha XG SoundSet
The Yamaha S-YXG50 synth was my goto in XP, but the .sf2 implementation is not nearly as good. No longer a favourite. Difficult to find and not worth the effort IMHO.
Generally OK, but I find the brass wanting
Both from the same creator, the latter is the predecessor - Generally OK, but I find the brass wanting
Timbres Of Heaven GM_GS_XG_SFX V 3.4 Final.sf2
Generally OK, but I find the brass wanting
Titanic 200 GM-GS SoundFont 1.1.sf2
Generally OK, but I find the brass wanting
Generally OK, but I find the brass wanting
As you might be able to tell, I'm particularly fussy about the brass sounds... And they're often very disappointing.
List from DISLIKE table: 053.7mg Taiji Generation V6.66 Bank.sf2 38.1mg the atomic soundfont v1.0 bank.sf2 61.9mg_Jurgen_GM_GS_Bank.sf2 65.8mg music man gm gs v1.0 bank.sf2 8Rock11e.sf2 Airfont_340.sf2 airfont_380_final.sf2 Arachno_SoundFont_Version_1.0.sf2 Creative (emu10k1)8MBGMSFX.SF2 Creative Labs 2M GM_2gmgsmt.sf2 Creative Labs 4M GM_4gmgsmt.sf2 CrisisGeneralMidi3.01.sf2 CT2MGM.SF2 CT4MGM.SF2 Hyper-VSC SF-GS v2.sf2 OmegaGMGS2.sf2 Roland SC-55 50 MB by Trevor James.sf2 Roland SC-55 54 MB by Trevor James.sf2 ross.sf2 sYnerGi 200.sf2 sYnerGi 200LE.sf2 sYnerGi-8Mb.sf2 sYnerGiGS.sf2 SYNTHGMS.sf2
Disclaimer: To the best of my knowledge all of these soundfonts are freely distributed by the authors with the exception of the Creative ones which I progressively acquired as I purchased various Creative sound cards over the past several decades.
Hey Flurmy, pretty sure it's the soundfont. And it seems to only be the Acoustic Grand Piano patch too.
I'm also using VirtualMIDISynth and didn't have a problem (my current soundfont is Merlin_GMPro(v3.15). I didn't have a copy of Airfont340, but I did have a copy of Airfont380_Final and it was also fine, so I hunted around and found a copy of Airfont340 and voila, there it was, but as mentioned, apparently only patch 0 (the Acoustic Grand). NB I didn't check all the patches, just a small sample.
Actually, to be more correct, it's possible it's the combination of the soundfont and Coolsoft VirtualMIDISynth and NWC. To be certain a different synth using the airfont340 soundfont should be tested.
Where does that last top F# comes from? A can't see any reason!
I must be missing something... I've downloaded the file, opened it in NWC it plays as it reads. Checked the nwctxt and it is exactly what I would expect. From the key sig F's are sharp anyway, but the ties make each chord the same anyhow.
Being a retired IT pro and the cynic I am, and given the history of the quality of m$ release products, there is no way on this earth I would install Win 11 before it's been around for at least a year, and maybe not even then. I only moved from XP 2 years ago because I finally HAD to move to a new machine. IMHO the first XP was very poor, but by the time SP3 was out it'd become quite reasonable Vista was a disaster Win 7 was just enough better to be reliable but configurability was terrible Win 8 and 10 added their terrible UI changes and even more configurability issues, 11 just seems to make things worse again.
Seriously, if I'd wanted a Mac and iPhone combined, I would've bought a Mac and an iPhone, I don't need windoze to pretend to be one.
<snip> Graphical additions: A1. Support for smaller staff size. This includes size reduction of all symbols on the staff, including texts, slurs and ties, dynamics.
Perhaps an acceptable way to approach this is a scaling factor property for staves. Similar to the existing scaling factor that's available for text objects, except the staff property would affect everything on the staff.
Another idea. (wait for it...) A Staffsig user object that searches for all subsequent bar lines and redraws them at a specified height. Perhaps it would require them to have visibility set to None, to prevent alignment glitches,
Maybe an associated user tool that can set the visibility to Never... Of course that could also be achieved with Global_Mod...
Or better yet, a staff property setting in the next version of NWC that lets you specify the barline height for a percussion staff with a single staff line.
I really like this idea best - It feels well past time for the next version. Not that I'm having any problems with what we have, but it just seems that there are possible features that could potentially revolutionise how we use NWC.
Years ago when I was fiddling with fonts I experimented with creating a font that was just barlines. It was based around my SwingDings suite and the intention was to use a user tool to overlay the NWC generated barlines with text objects that were lines (actually characters) from the font.
The idea was to try to imitate a handwritten appearance for barlines. The associated VBScript I wrote was supposed to randomly select from some barline sets within the font file. Either 1 of 10 (IIRC) possible normal barlines or 1 of 3 (again IIRC) decorated barlines.
I never ended up completing the project because of both time constraints and limited usefulness. However, perhaps you could use a similar approach?
RickG used to use headless, muted grace notes to create vertical lines with their stems. You would need to make the real barlines invisible because I don't think you could successfully exactly overlay the stem on the real barline.
OR, you could try placing a text vertical line positioned centre justified at next note/bar. The <|> (<Shift+\>) character springs to mind. There are also line drawing characters in some fonts accessible through Character Map but they might be a bit bold/thick.
There may also be an object available that could be co-opted for this role, but that information would have to come from the creator or a user experienced with the putative object.
I was afraid of that. One or two chords in the whole piece and it seems I have to create yards of bars!? <snip>
Yeah, it can be a bit of a pain sometimes, but it isn't really that hard. Make one bar with a hidden whole rest and a barline and copy and paste it as many times as needed to get to the place where you need the chord. You can even copy and paste it say, 4 times, then copy and paste the 4 bar block to make it go faster.