Parallel Time Signatures

Topic: Parallel Time Signatures (Read 17101 times) previous topic - next topic

Parallel Time Signatures

2007-08-11 02:33 pm

This is a possible solution to a long-standing problem.

Two immediate snags. You can't tripletize a single dotted note, and you can't beam a rest/note combination so beamed quaver triplets are still a no-no.

Re: Parallel Time Signatures

Reply #1 – 2007-08-21 01:23 am

Thanks Peter,
I was just listening and I love the sustain effect very useful for CG guitar parts .

Re: Parallel Time Signatures

Reply #2 – 2007-09-04 01:49 am

G'day Peter,
now I've had a better look at this there are some interesting possibilities, but I don't think I'd like to notate an entire piece this way...

Still, an effective solution for shorter sections.

Re: Parallel Time Signatures

Reply #3 – 2007-09-04 10:34 am

Nor would I. It would be much easier if we had control over triplet placing and an option not to show any articulations etc at all.

And a thought. Why do RestChords have 'Articulation on Stem' ticked when they can't have articulations?

Re: Parallel Time Signatures

Reply #4 – 2007-09-04 10:52 am

G'day Peter,

Quote from: Peter Edwards – 2007-09-04 10:34 am

And a thought. Why do RestChords have 'Articulation on Stem' ticked when they can't have articulations?

Umm, 'cos the notes in the restchord can, maybe..?

Re: Parallel Time Signatures

Reply #5 – 2007-09-04 12:37 pm

So they can: but only if you put them in when entering the note.

But try taking them out or putting them in by editing the combination. That's just bizarre.