NoteWorthy Composer Forum

Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Rick G. on 2006-01-10 07:32 AM

Title: Accidental positioning anomaly in 1y
Post by: Rick G. on 2006-01-10 07:32 AM
NoteWorthy is usually very good at this, but ...

My source, Warner Bros. Publications Inc. uses the positioning in the second note and I agree with them.
Layer these 2 staves:

Code: [Select · Download]
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
# Layer with next staff
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:b-4,n-2,0,b3
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:-4,n-2,0,3|Opts:XAccSpace=1
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
Code: [Select · Download]
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Rest|Dur:4th|Visibility:Never
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:b-4z,0z,b3z|Opts:StemLength=0,NoLegerLines,Muted
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
Title: Re: Accidental positioning anomaly in 1y
Post by: David Palmquist on 2006-01-10 08:39 AM
I'm looking at a Warner Bros. book now.  I agree it seems as if, where there are 3 altered notes close to each other in a chord, the middle sign gets pushed left.  Where there are only 2 altered notes, the lower one seems to be the one realigned.

[abbr=in his The Complete Arranger, using either a handwritten or jazz font face]Nestico[/abbr] seems to do the same with 3 altered notes, but where there are 4 altered notes in a chord, he puts the lowest and the third signs out to the left, and the second and fourth close to the noteheads.

Strayhorn seems to align the signs [abbr=see his autographed manuscript on page 190 of Something to Live For, The Music of Billy Strayhorn, by Walter van de Leur]vertically[/abbr], but musicologist Walter van de Leur seems to do the same as Nestico.

Again, with 3 altered notes, Mark Tucker in his The Duke Ellington Reader, page 416, reproduces a transcription by Gunther Schuller which puts the middle sign out to the left, a la Warner Bros.

I imagine there is a music notation bible of some sort out there to set the standard.
Title: Re: Accidental positioning anomaly in 1y
Post by: Rick G. on 2006-01-10 09:51 AM
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. A jazz standard is an oxymoron isn't it? I wish I could find some standards. University of Colorado and LilyPond try, but are woefully incomplete.

My normal reference is G. Schirmers' 54 Piano Pieces from the modern repertoire, which has some of the hardest to reproduce bits imaginable.

This is like the Scotch snap problem. Easy to workaround, but hard to spot ...
Until you screw up in front of 100 people ...

Yeah, I know, I should catch these things in practice.  But when I've finished notating a piece, I've spent so much time with it that I know how to play most of it, but 6 months later when I pull it out to do a request, the errors hit me.
Title: Re: Accidental positioning anomaly in 1y
Post by: Lawrie Pardy on 2006-01-10 11:04 AM
G'day all,
I read up a bit on this in my Alfred's "Essential Dictionary of Musical Notation".  It has quite a bit to say about the placement of accidentals but a few specific excerpts may help:

The second example fits the pattern as described by my buddy Alf.

Say Rick, a jazz standard an oxymoron?  What about "Basin St. Blues" or "In the Mood" - they're standards aren't they? <vbg>

Lawrie
Title: Re: Accidental positioning anomaly in 1y
Post by: Rick G. on 2006-01-10 01:19 PM
Thanks Lawrie. I'm going to look Alfred up the next time I'm at a used book store.  I wonder if the rules are the same for dbl#.  Seems one could start packing closer than a sixth. G. Schirmer (probably the biggest US publisher) also "half tucks" flats for a nice effect. They also start closer, clipping half the leger line if needed. 'Spose that's too much to ask of NoteWorthy.