NoteWorthy Composer Forum

Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Andrew Johnson on 2000-07-05 04:00 AM

Title: Dynamic Variance bug?
Post by: Andrew Johnson on 2000-07-05 04:00 AM
The help text for 1.70 (love all the new features BTW!) explains how dynamic variance works, and states that only "cresc." and "decresc." actually affect the MIDI output.

I want "dim." to do just that, so I inserted a hidden "decresc." as well as the visible "dim.", but it seems that the presence of the "dim." dynamic variance object stops the "decresc." from doing its job! I can (and do) work around the problem by inserting the "dim." as a text item, but it seems a bit silly that I have to do it this way.

Am I being unreasonable in wanting "dim." to be made MIDI-active like "decresc."? As a programmer myself I can't believe it should be that difficult to do.
Title: Re: Dynamic Variance bug?
Post by: Steve Allen on 2000-07-06 04:00 AM
I agree, a dim. that effects midi output would be an easy and useful enhancement. Dim. is less than half the length of Decresc. so scores with lots of dynamic changes would look significantly less cluttered.
Title: Re: Dynamic Variance bug?
Post by: Brian on 2000-07-06 04:00 AM
The "decresc." item will still do its job if it is put after the "dim." instead of before it.
Title: Re: Dynamic Variance bug?
Post by: NoteWorthy Online on 2000-07-07 04:00 AM
We will consider this.