59
I'm not if this has been brought up before or not..
The following construct displays incorrectly:
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|RestChord|Dur:8th|Opts:Stem=Up,ArticulationsOnStem|Dur2:Whole|Pos2:-3,-2
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
|Note|Dur:Half|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
The quaver on the 4th space should be to the right of the semibreve on the second line.
61
Reckon I've got a bug here:
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble
|Key|Signature:C
|TimeSig|Signature:Common
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatOpen
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-6
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-5
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-3
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatClose
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:4
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:3
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:2
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Bar
|Ending|Endings:1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-3
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:2
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Flow|Style:DaCapo|Pos:7|Justify:Right|Placement:AtNextNote
|Bar
|Ending|Endings:2,D
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:2
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-3
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Bar|Style:Double
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-3
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-5
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-6
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
The n time bars never play - doesn't matter whether there is a Master repeat close at the end of the 1st time bar or not...
BTW, this is a real world example - except for the "tune" of course.
71
G'day all,
found a problem with ties on chords with an interval of a 2nd... If the lower note is above the centre line (B) then the tie slopes upward - this results in it crossing the note above it:
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Chord|Dur:Half|Pos:0^,3^,4^
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:0,3,4|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:1|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Chord|Dur:Half|Pos:-3^,0^,1^
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-3,0,1|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:1|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
The first bar shows the problem, the second shows how it changes at Pos 0
I don't recall this in previous betas but may simply have never come across it... I suspect it may be an artifact from the recent stem alignment fix.
<edit> there needs to be a 3rd note in the chord below the 2nd interval - if it is only a 2 note chord the ties go in opposite directions and it is OK. Tie direction isn't the problem as such, it is the fact of starting too far left for the lower note in the 2nd interval part of the chord.
I hope that's a bit clearer...
79
Found the following irritation...
The first bar should, in my view, look like the second...
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble|OctaveShift:None|Color:0|Visibility:Default
|TimeSig|Signature:4/4|Color:0|Visibility:Default
|RestChord|Dur:8th,Slur|Opts:Stem=Up,ArticulationsOnStem,VertOffset=2|Dur2:Whole|Pos2:-3,-2
|Note|Dur:8th,Slur|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
|Note|Dur:Half|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-3,2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-4,1|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar|Style:Single|XBarCnt:N|SysBreak:N|Color:0|Visibility:Default
|RestChord|Dur:8th,Slur|Opts:Stem=Up,ArticulationsOnStem,VertOffset=2|Dur2:Whole|Pos2:-3,-2
|Text|Text:" "|Font:StaffItalic|Pos:3|Wide:Y
|Note|Dur:8th,Slur|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
|Note|Dur:Half|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-3,2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-4,1|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
The quaver in the top voice should not appear to be directly chorded with the semibreve chord in the lower voice. The second bar has some white space added to correct the appearance.
81
Happy new year everyone!
I dunno if I'm half an hour early or half an hour late! 'tis 12:30 AM here on the East coast of Australia and we're in daylight savings time...
Ahh, who cares!?!
[move]<Image Link> Happy New Year! <Image Link>[/move]
May God's richest blessings be upon us all!
84
This issue has been corrected.
See reply 6 below for details, or just download the updated *Dings-V1d.ttf files in this zip file:
EDIT - This update is probably no longer needed - I will leave it up, but if you have downloaded any of the affected suites (SwingDings, MusikDingsSans and MusikDingsSerif) since the 3rd of September 2006, then you already have these updates as they are incorporated in the ZIP files you downloaded.
Install by first removing the affected font files from your fonts directory (normally c:\Windows\Fonts) and then copying these new files in their place.
The affected fonts are:
- SwingDings
- MusikDingsSans
- MusikDingsSerif
Be careful not to remove any other SwingDings, MusikDingsSans or MusikDingsSerif fonts as only the 3 mentioned above are affected.
I highly recommend that you do NOT extract from the zip file directly into the fonts directory - I have seen this cause problems - unzip to another location and then copy the files to their final destination.
G'day all,
it has been brought to my attention that there are some inconsistencies in MusikDingsSerif, MusikdingsSans and SwingDings.
The problem is courtesy accidentals. In MusikdingsSans and MusikDingsSerif the courtesy natural, sharp and double sharp are all 1 position lower than the insertion point, the flat and double flat are 2 positions lower.
Interestingly, SwingDings which both MusikDings files were modelled off are all only 1 position lower.
Hence, my dilemma...
If I modify all 3 suites to have them at the insertion point (which I'm happy to do - I don't know how I missed it in the first place ) how will it affect other users. No problem if there has been little use of courtesies so far but if there are works already completed it may be a problem for some people.
The MusikDings pair have not had the interest of SwingDings so modifying the flat and the double flat to make everything 1 position lower to match the rest is no big deal (IMHO).
I might add that I intend to do at least this as the 3 suites are supposed to be completely interchangeable. For this reason I'm reluctant to get them actually at the insertion point if it will affect users of SwingDings.
Comments anyone?
Sorry for the errors folks.
92
Just downloaded the p1q release of NWC2 and was testing the cursor positioning after various staff related actions - as discussed in https://forum.noteworthycomposer.com/?topic=5046.
I noticed that when you perform audit enharmonic spelling on a transposed staff the audit is done with respect to concert pitch _and_ the key signature rather than just the key signature of the staff. I realise this is not new with p1q, but I only just twigged to what was going on...
Unless I'm missing something I don't think this is very useful. Fine on untransposed staves but...
Two examples I experimented with:
- A trumpet part transposed for a Bb trumpet, +2 semitones with playback transposition updated - gives -2 on the midi transposition
- A guitar staff - midi transposition to give an octave lower pitch than notated.
In both cases the written staff was returned to concert _but_ the midi transposition was not updated. Thus, successive audits result in progressively changed staves.
This:
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble
|Key|Signature:F#,C#
|TimeSig|Signature:4/4
|Rest|Dur:Half
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-2^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-2
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-4^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-1
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-2^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-5^
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-5
|Rest|Dur:4th
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
becomes this after 2 audits:
!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.0,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble
|Key|Signature:F#,C#
|TimeSig|Signature:4/4
|Rest|Dur:Half
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:n-6
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-5^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-5
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:#-5
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:n-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:n-6^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-6
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:n-3
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:n-5^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-5^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:n-5^|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:n-6|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:#-8^
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-8
|Rest|Dur:4th
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End
But only if there is a midi transposition on the staff of -2 (for this particular example)
The same thing happens if there is an instrument patch inserted that contains a midi transposition without a midi transposition on the staff itself, but only for the notes that appear after the instrument patch. This is at least consistent
Is this deliberate and thus for a purpose I haven't recognised or have we a bug?