Show Posts - Flurmy

1001

General Discussion / Re: In a repeated section, how can I make Sop. & Alto sound first time & T,B 2nd?

2014-03-25 07:19 PM

Quote

I downloaded it, removed the opening MPC, stopped and restarted it several times. I heard no problems.

Rick, you're right!
Perhaps something has changed in NWC since I started to use the trick.
I tried to find the relevant topic here in the forum but with no result.

After a bit of head scratching I have the doubt that the problem first appeared with volume because of a fade out. Anyway, I just checked and now even in that case there's no need for the trick.

I'm almost sure to remember that long ago Eric explained how NWC work(ed) and how to overcome the problem.
That is: that trick is not my invention.

But maybe I dreamed! :-)

"Dreaming permits each and every one of us to be quietly and safely insane every night of our lives."
William Dement

1002

General Discussion / Re: In a repeated section, how can I make Sop. & Alto sound first time & T,B 2nd?

2014-03-24 09:16 PM

Quote

I would be discouraged by your comments.

Really? Not my intent at all.

Quote

In actual use, I do not find replay a problem.

Probably you use the pitch bend very rarely or either you rarely stop and restart a pitch bended tune.

Anyway, the problem is not so terrible once you know how to completely solve it: put a parameter reset at the very beginning of the score. (Explication and trick suggested by Eric.)

An example? There are some in the Scripto, from me and from others, but I'd like to suggest this one:
https://forum.noteworthycomposer.com/?topic=7876.msg54814#msg54814
Please note that the erhu score has

Quote

|MPC|Controller:pitch|Style:Absolute|TimeRes:Eighth|SweepRes:128|Pt1:0,8192|Pos:8|Wide:Y

at the beginning exactly to allow for a stop and restart.

By the way: the other problem, the one in the topic of that thread, probably a rounding one, is still present.

1003

General Discussion / Re: In a repeated section, how can I make Sop. & Alto sound first time & T,B 2nd?

2014-03-24 06:41 PM

Quote

they can cause strange behaviour on subsequent replays.

Bill, usually this is the effect of how NWC parses the commands.
It does a back search of many things, including MPCs, before replays.
If it doesn't find anything of a kind, that kind of parameter is unchanged.
I met this effect many times, in particular with the pitch bend. :-|

To have a consistent behaviour simply put a parameter reset at the very beginning of the score.
For example, if you use the expression MPC in a staff (well: a channel, to be precise) then put an expression MPC with the absolute value 127.

1004

General Discussion / Re: Unread posts in forum icons

2014-03-24 09:22 AM

No, Lawrie, it's my cache to blame.
Sorry.

1005

General Discussion / Re: Unread posts in forum icons

2014-03-24 08:09 AM

The old icons are back.
Thank you!

1006

General Discussion / Re: In a repeated section, how can I make Sop. & Alto sound first time & T,B 2nd?

2014-03-24 08:08 AM

You can use the volume or (better) the expression MPC instead of the "ppp" and "mf" (or whatever).
In that case the output level can be really 0.

1007

General Discussion / Re: Unread posts in forum icons

2014-03-13 08:05 PM

.. or set a bookmark at https://forum.noteworthycomposer.com/?action=unread

1008

General Discussion / Re: Unread posts in forum icons

2014-03-13 07:58 AM

I don't like it and I was just wondering why this happened.
I did nothing to my browser setup. A problem with the cache?
Then I found this topic...

1009

General Discussion / Re: Noteworthy Newsgroup

2014-02-25 04:15 PM

Yes, it is uuencoded.

1010

General Discussion / Re: Slowing down

2014-02-25 10:51 AM

Quote

Unrolling the flow in a hidden staff and being simple and explicit removes complexities. At worst it requires some math, and math is hard ...

That's it.

In the actual score there are many refrains and to unroll all of them is a p.i.t.a., with the added burden of having a staff (the hidden one) completely out of synch with the others and much longer.
Very error prone, for my taste.

Your first suggestion is my way to go.

1011

General Discussion / Re: Slowing down

2014-02-24 07:45 AM

Quote

It appears that "before" and "after" are meant in a visual sense rather than a logical or musical sense

That's exactly what I meant with "It seems that the tempo indications are not subjected to the special endings parser."

Quote

I don't see any bugs here.

Well, at least we can say that's not very intuitive.
What's the logic behind that choice?

1012

General Discussion / Re: Noteworthy Newsgroup

2014-02-23 08:50 PM

I agree with Rick.

John, you can use http://news.noteworthysoftware.com, even if it's not the best way.

1013

General Discussion / Re: Slowing down

2014-02-23 08:46 PM

Good workaround, thank you Rick!

Still, I don't understand why I need it.
What's the logic?

P.S. The hidden tempo staff trick is too complicated in my real score.

1014

General Discussion / Slowing down

2014-02-23 10:30 AM

My aim is to slow down the second time, so I tried this way:

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.51,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble
|TimeSig|Signature:4/4
|Key|Signature:C|Tonic:C
|Dynamic|Style:f|Pos:-11
|Tempo|Tempo:100|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatOpen
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-7|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-5,-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-7|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-6|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-4,-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-6|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|TempoVariance|Style:Ritardando|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-5,-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-6,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Ending|Endings:1|ClosedBracket:Y
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-9|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-7,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-9|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-6,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatClose
|Ending|Endings:2
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-9|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-7,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-9|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Tempo|Tempo:50|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Bar
|Chord|Dur:Whole|Pos:-6,-4,-3
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

As you can ear, that's not the case.
To begin with, it slows down the first time too (why?).
Then, when it reaches the "ritardando" for the second time, all of a sudden it restores the standard time and then slows down. (

)

I tried this way:

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.51,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble
|TimeSig|Signature:4/4
|Key|Signature:C|Tonic:C
|Dynamic|Style:f|Pos:-11
|Tempo|Tempo:100|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatOpen
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-7|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-5,-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-7|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-6|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-4,-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-6|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|TempoVariance|Style:Ritardando|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-5,-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-6,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar
|Ending|Endings:1|ClosedBracket:Y
|Tempo|Tempo:100|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-9|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-7,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-9|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-6,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-8|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Bar|Style:MasterRepeatClose
|Ending|Endings:2
|Rest|Dur:8th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:#-9|Opts:Stem=Up
|Chord|Dur:8th|Pos:-7,-4|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-9|Opts:Stem=Up,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Rest|Dur:4th
|Tempo|Tempo:50|Pos:8|Visibility:Never
|Bar
|Chord|Dur:Whole|Pos:-6,-4,-3
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

With my great surprise, now it never slows down.

It seems that the tempo indications are not subjected to the special endings parser.

1015

General Discussion / Hint

2014-02-07 10:15 PM

Just before a concert, my daughter mixed up the pages of the various pieces she had to play.
She had no time to sort them all, so my wife volunteered to do it for her.

Small problem: my wife knows very little about musical notation and many pages had the page number but not the title of the piece...

Why not allow to print somewere in all the pages (header or footer) the title in small characters?

N.B. My daughter had to play by heart. :-)

1016

General Discussion / Re: Numbers no longer change the duration of notes

2014-01-28 10:29 AM

Haymo, guess what I think about my daughter's laptop without any keylock leds... :-(

1017

General Discussion / Re: Upgrade problems?

2014-01-28 10:27 AM

Yes, many if not everybody.

This problem showed up during the beta stage but back then it had to be considered normal.
I expected it to be fixed in the official release but it seems it's not the case.

You have to "fix" the toolbars yourself by hand.

1018

General Discussion / Re: Problems with customizing toolbars

2014-01-14 08:42 PM

Quote

I have no advice on how to solve your permission problems. I use WinXP and everyone is an admin

Right click->Run as administrator

1019

General Discussion / Re: Problems with customizing toolbars

2014-01-14 04:22 PM

Quote

I don't have a "save all" button in the customize toolbar dialog box.

So do I. :-)
I suppose Harald intended to click the normal "File->Save all". (Unneeded operation, anyway)

I suppose you are using windows 7 or 8, in which case the directories c:\programs (x86)\... are protected and only the administrator is autorized to write there.
The file with the NWC toolbars is in that area.

Windows >= 7 don't care if you ARE the administrator; you have to expressly say "run as administrator" each time you have something important to do.
Don't ask me what I think about that!

Quote

the setup-program gave an error that I didn't have a proper copy of version 2.5.5.

The update program checks the actual installation and wants the configuration to match what was installed.
Probably, moving it here and there you screwed it up.

A solution is to simply remove the installed NWC, reinstall the first version you bought and then follow the chain of updates.
A bit annoying but nothing so terrible unless, of course, you have to do it every day. :-)

1020

General Discussion / Re: Problems with customizing toolbars

2014-01-14 11:26 AM

Indeed there are some "error" buttons, relics of the previous toolbar.
Their removal is as Harald said.

If the removal is not permanent I suspect there are problems in rewriting the toolbar description file under "programs (x86)\....". Another instance of the old problem of the permissions.

Try opening NWC as Administrator before changing the toolbars.

1021

General Discussion / Re: How do you say "OK"?

2014-01-11 06:19 PM

Yuk!
I should have used a dialog with an edit box that used the carriage return itself, but I can't recall which dialog was.

Thank you.

1022

General Discussion / How do you say "OK"?

2014-01-11 05:11 PM

In the dialogs, how do you say "Ok" with the keyboard?
The only way I found is to press tab until the focus is on the "Ok" button.
Very annoying, in particular in the dialogs with a lot of components.

1023

General Discussion / Re: Merry Christmas

2013-12-26 11:09 AM

Very nice!

Many years ago I saw people playing glasses live in Quebec city.

I also saw a glass harmonica, the Benjamin Franklin type, in the musical instruments museum in Rome and I have a CD recording of Mozart's adagio for glass harmonica K617a.

Season greetings to all of you.

1024

General Discussion / Re: What time is it?

2013-12-13 06:08 PM

One is "Port ui mhuirgheasa".
The other is "Caitlin Triall".

1025

General Discussion / What time is it?

2013-12-13 10:27 AM

I have a couple of scores by Alan Stivell.
For both the time is 6/8 and the tempo is indicated as "100 = quaver" and "132 = quaver".
I set the tempo in NWC as "quaver = 100" and "quaver = 132". It's the same thing, isn't it?

I never heard the first piece but, sure, the second one is waaaaay too slow.
An acceptable value for the latter is "dotted crotchet = 132".

How should I read the Stivell's tempo indications? (I don't think I could ask him ;-)

1026

General Discussion / Re: tablette IPAd

2013-12-05 08:56 PM

Non, et il n'y a pas d'idée de l'exporter sur d'autre systèmes operatifs. Même pas Linux.
Au moin ça c'est nôtre impression. (Nôtre dans le sens des utilisateurs...)

1027

General Discussion / Re: Really off topic, but way too entertaining to keep secret :)

2013-12-03 08:18 PM

Quote

I'm the one with the gray hair and beard, and spectacles.

Popeye? Darwin? Father Christmas? Superman? :-)

1028

General Discussion / Re: Including small note-heads in a NWC score

2013-12-02 08:35 PM

You must insert each of them separately as text.
In the text dialog box select "Staff cue symbols".
N.B. Remember to check "Placement->Preseve width".

1029

General Discussion / Re: Staff justification

2013-11-08 07:27 AM

Quote

I just set it once and clone the staves I need. I have ceased to be annoyed

Like my other "standard settings", I did it in all the templates, but I must remember NOT to use the default for it's not customizable...

1030

General Discussion / Re: Staff justification

2013-11-06 01:12 PM

The "official" way should be "Page setup->Options->Extend last system" but the trick Rich explained is often better.

1031

General Discussion / Re: Trill - a question for the music theorists

2013-11-04 12:04 PM

Oh well... What can I say? Trust your ears!

1032

General Discussion / Re: Trill - a question for the music theorists

2013-11-04 08:08 AM

Just my two cents: did you see that you wrote "A# tr#" and not just "A# tr"?
I think this removes every doubt.

1033

General Discussion / Re: Import resolutions

2013-11-03 10:09 PM

Aha! Probably this is the cause of this old problem: https://forum.noteworthycomposer.com/?topic=8068.0

1034

General Discussion / Re: Hidden dot

2013-11-02 09:03 PM

But...

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.51,Single)
|Chord|Dur:4th,Dotted,Slur|Pos:-3|Opts:Stem=Up,Slur=Upward|Dur2:Half,Dotted|Pos2:-3
|Chord|Dur:4th,Dotted,Slur|Pos:-2|Opts:Stem=Up,Slur=Upward|Dur2:Half,Dotted|Pos2:-2
|Note|Dur:4th,Dotted,Slur|Pos:1|Opts:Slur=Upward
|Bar
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

Why not doing something for the dots also when the notes are in the space?

1035

General Discussion / Re: Hidden dot

2013-11-02 08:27 PM

Nice workarounds.
Thank you.

1036

General Discussion / Hidden dot

2013-11-02 06:15 PM

In this snippet, the dot of the first note is hidden.

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.51,Single)
|TimeSig|Signature:6/8
|Chord|Dur:4th,Dotted,Slur|Pos:-5|Opts:Stem=Up,Slur=Upward|Dur2:Half,Dotted|Pos2:-5
|Note|Dur:4th,Dotted,Slur|Pos:-1|Opts:Slur=Upward
|Bar
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

The score where it comes from allows a bit more space between the notes to show the dot.

1037

General Discussion / Change staff metrics

2013-11-02 03:18 PM

I think I already asked this, but I don't remember the answer.
Why, while changing staff metrics with "proportionately scale other staff font sizes", the user font sizes don't change?
Maybe they were conceived as something not "staff font", but more often than not, if not always, I'd prefer them to scale.
What do you think about it?

1038

General Discussion / Re: Nuisance habit of NWC: ALWAYS selecting "LETTER" size in PDF995

2013-10-20 02:27 PM

I think it's not NWC to blame.
I see A4 in all my printers (virtual and not).
The only "letter" is in Microsoft XPS Document Writer, that I never used. :-)

1039

General Discussion / Re: PDF vs printer

2013-10-20 09:33 AM

Well, papi22, sure it works, but I don't see any advantage to do it in two steps instead of generating a pdf directly.
Anyway, each one is free to use whatever he prefers.

1040

General Discussion / Re: PDF vs printer

2013-10-18 06:34 AM

David, do you know that Foxit Reader also installs "Foxit Reader PDF printer"?
No need for PDFCreator anymore.

1041

General Discussion / Re: Import resolutions

2013-10-09 06:39 AM

My best wishes, Haymo, even if a bit late... ;-)

1042

General Discussion / Re: Import resolutions

2013-10-08 08:39 AM

Haymo, let me expand my second post:

I checked Use the import wizard on open, then I dropped my file to NWC.
The wizard opened, I choose Note Resolution = Quarter Note and, pronto!, all was as I expected.

As I wrote, all this seems to work only if Use the import wizard on open is checked (i.e. you use the wizard).

1043

General Discussion / Re: Import resolutions

2013-10-07 09:04 PM

It seems to work only if Use the import wizard on open is checked!

1044

General Discussion / Import resolutions

2013-10-07 08:56 PM

I must admit I never really understood what Note Resolution and Rest Resolution
do. I never found any difference.

Now I imported a file with a slight defect in the rhithm.
I find very boring to adjust it by hand, so I selected Note Resolution = Quarte Note: no change.
I then selected Whole Note: no change.

No matter what I choose, I keep getting this:

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.51,Single)
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:3^,5^,7^
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th,Dotted|Pos:3^,5^,7^|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:3^,5^,7^
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th,Dotted|Pos:3^,5^,7^|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:-4
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:3^,5^,7^
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th,Dotted|Pos:3^,5^,7^|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:4th|Pos:0
|Chord|Dur:4th|Pos:3^,5^,7^
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Chord|Dur:8th,Dotted|Pos:3^,5^,7^|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Chord|Dur:32nd|Pos:3,5,7|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

Am I missing sometring?

1045

General Discussion / Re: Grace notes and ties

2013-10-06 07:06 PM

All the rest was known to me.

This was the missing tile:

Quote

I know from experience that once grace notes exhaust a "following note", they steal time from the next one.

1046

General Discussion / Re: Grace notes and ties

2013-10-06 12:23 PM

Rick, you're incredible!
How do you think things like that?

Thank you for the workaround.

1047

General Discussion / Grace notes and ties

2013-10-06 11:09 AM

I discovered that, for the grace notes, the ties are not considered.
The grace notes only steal time from the first note.
Listen to the mordent here:

Code: (nwc) [Select · Download]

!NoteWorthyComposerClip(2.5,Single)
|Clef|Type:Treble|OctaveShift:Octave Up
|TimeSig|Signature:2/4
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet=First,Slur|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet,Slur|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet=End,Slur|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:0|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet=First,Slur|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet,Slur|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Note|Dur:16th,Triplet=End,Slur|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:0|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Rest|Dur:16th
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:5|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Rest|Dur:16th
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam
|Note|Dur:8th,Grace,Slur|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Up,Slur=Upward|Visibility:Never
|Note|Dur:8th,Grace,Slur|Pos:3|Opts:Stem=Up,Slur=Upward|Visibility:Never
|Note|Dur:16th|Pos:2^|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Bar
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:2|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=First
|Note|Dur:8th,Dotted|Pos:0|Opts:Stem=Down,Beam=End
|Rest|Dur:16th
|Note|Dur:8th|Pos:-1
|Bar
!NoteWorthyComposerClip-End

I think it shouldn't be so.

1048

General Discussion / Re: Shift treble cleft down 8 for TTBB ?

2013-09-28 01:14 PM

Quote

are both scored on the one treble cleft and a '8' underneath the treble cleft

Sorry, Haymo, I missed that detail.
The correct answer is the one of fathafluff.

1049

General Discussion / Re: Shift treble cleft down 8 for TTBB ?

2013-09-28 08:11 AM

Alternatively you can transpose the instrument -12 semitones.
(Staff->Staff properties->Instrument->Transposition)

1050

Avant-garde / Re: Guitar Tablature

2013-09-25 07:14 AM

I would say: how to display repeat barlines and TimeSigs on staves with a number of lines different from 5 or 1 (N.B. the only ones I use).
6 is certainly the number of strings most used in tablatures, but there are other string instruments with a different number of strings.

Messages

Messages - Flurmy